Anonymous Voting Tool
The loudest voice in the room shouldn't decide what gets built. Bandos simultaneous anonymous voting surfaces what your group actually believes, not what feels safe to say out loud.
Most product decisions are made by whoever speaks first, whoever is most senior, or whoever is most confident. That's not strategy. That's social pressure.
The HiPPO effect (Highest Paid Person's Opinion) is well-documented. When the CEO or lead investor expresses a preference, everyone else adjusts their position to match. The result is a “consensus” that reflects one person's conviction, not the group's actual thinking.
Dot voting makes it worse. When votes are placed on a whiteboard for everyone to see, participants watch where the dots accumulate and follow the crowd, especially if a senior person has already voted. Even well-intentioned teams default to social conformity when voting is public.
Bandos breaks this dynamic entirely. Everyone votes at the same time, from their own device. Results only appear after every participant has committed. There's no way to anchor to someone else's vote, so what you see in the results is what the group actually believed, not what they were willing to say out loud.
Three properties make Bandos voting meaningfully different from traditional tools.
All participants vote at the same time, each from their own device. No one can see how others voted before committing their own choice. The vote is locked before any result is visible.
The session host cannot reveal results until every participant has voted. There is no partial tally, no early peek. Everyone is working from the same blank slate until the moment votes are revealed.
When results reveal, every participant sees the same distribution simultaneously. Discussion about what the data means starts from the real outcome, not a post-hoc rationalization of what the room already assumed.
The format of voting determines the quality of the outcome.
Traditional dot voting
Participants place dots on a shared board, one by one. Early voters anchor the outcome. Later voters gravitate toward options that are already winning. Seniority bias compounds: the first vote from the most senior person in the room carries disproportionate weight.
Bandos anonymous voting
Every participant sees the same blank slate. Votes are submitted privately in parallel. Results reveal only when everyone has committed, eliminating anchoring, conformity pressure, and the outsized influence of whoever goes first.
Traditional dot voting
Whoever presents most confidently, sits at the head of the table, or has the most authority can steer the group before a single dot is placed. The vote ratifies a direction that was already decided socially.
Bandos anonymous voting
Because votes are anonymous and simultaneous, participants can vote honestly without fear of disagreeing with a co-founder, investor, or senior colleague. The result reflects what people actually believe. The results often surprise even the most experienced teams.
Any decision where social pressure could distort the outcome.
Choosing which idea to build when both founders have a strong preference. Anonymous voting lets each person commit honestly without the risk of damaging the relationship. It surfaces genuine disagreement before it becomes a conflict.
Getting honest input from engineers, designers, and marketers when the CEO is in the room. Anonymous voting gives junior team members permission to vote their actual conviction rather than defer to the person who hired them.
Running workshops where client stakeholders need to agree on a product direction. Anonymous voting surfaces genuine client consensus and prevents the most senior stakeholder from overriding the group's actual thinking.
Related: Product ideation tool · See the full process · Bandos vs Miro · For agencies
Free to start. Run a session in minutes. No facilitation experience needed.
Get Started for Free